Menu
Call Us Today
416-616-5628
Dependent Contractors are entitled to reasonable notice of employment termination, Ontario Court of Appeal rules
All Posts By

De Bousquet PC of De Bousquet PC

Dependent Contractors are entitled to reasonable notice of employment termination, Ontario Court of Appeal rules

By Uncategorized No Comments

The recent decision of Keenan v. Canac Kitchens (Keenan), confirms that dependant contractors are entitled to reasonable notice of employment termination. The required notice period can extend to years, and such as in this case, amount to 26 months. In Keenan, two long-term contractors of a kitchen cabinet manufacturing firm, with a total of over 50 years of experience with the company, were dismissed without notice. The pair were first hired as employees, but were later told that they would be classified as contractors, and signed new agreements for this purpose. They were required to use their own cars as…

Read More

Employers responsible for protecting their employees from harassment on social media finds an Ontario Labour Arbitrator

By Uncategorized

According to a recent decision by an Ontario labour arbitrator, employers may now be liable for not protecting their employees from harassment on the employer’s social media accounts. In this decision, the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) workers’ union filed a grievance regarding the TTC’s social media account created to communicate with the general public, alleging that the account served as a platform to harass TTC employees. The arbitrator granted the union’s grievance, despite the employer’s argument that, in this time of readily-available internet access, it is impossible for an employer to effectively filter all harassing social media posts. The arbitrator…

Read More

Hot temper of an employee may provide just cause for dismissal says a recent Alberta decision

By Uncategorized

In the recent Alberta case of Turner v Atco Frontec Corp the court held that an employee’s hot temper culminating in inappropriate and aggressive behavior towards another employee might provide adequate just cause for dismissal. The deterioration of the relationship between the employee and the rest of the team was found to be, in and of itself, an adequate ground of dismissal, independent of any finding of harassment towards other employees. In this case, Mr. Turner alleged wrongful dismissal after he was terminated due to coming into conflict with another member of the employer’s team. The employee had a history…

Read More

Ontario Human Rights Tribunal speaks on what constitutes creed-based belief protected under the Human Rights Code

By Uncategorized

The Ontario Human Rights Code protects one from discrimination due to both religious and creed-based beliefs. Unfortunately, the Code does not define “creed” and, while courts have interpreted “creed” in a rather broad manner (link to blog about veganism as creed) to also include sincerely-held non-religious beliefs, this remains an uncertain area of law. The recent case of Barker v. St. Elizabeth Health Care provides much needed guidance on the question of what is legitimate creed-based belief as opposed to mere personal preference. In this case, a Rastafarian man claimed that his home healthcare provider discriminated against him by continuing to send…

Read More

Employees of Federally-Regulated Employers cannot be dismissed without cause, the Supreme Court of Canada Rules

By Uncategorized

In the most recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court established that the common law rule that a non-unionized employee can be dismissed without cause is not applicable to federally-regulated employers. In other words, federally regulated employers are always required to provide just cause or reasons for the dismissal of non-unionized employees, or may face the broad remedies provided under the Canada Labour Code, including reinstatement. In this significant case, an employee of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited was dismissed without cause or reasons after almost 5 years with the employer. The employee filed a suit alleging…

Read More

Human Rights Tribunal awards nearly $30,000 to a restaurant worker groped by a drunken boss

By Uncategorized

As an employee, you have a right to a workplace free from harassment and unwanted sexual advances. Unfortunately, as this case illustrates, women still face a disproportionally high risk of sexual harassment and assault, especially in the restaurant, bar and entertainment industries. The case below illustrates the seriousness of such conduct, especially when abuse by somebody in a position of authority is involved. In this case the applicant, De Anna Granes, worked at the respondent’s restaurant as a server prior to the incident. [1] One night, one of the co-owners became inebriated after consuming a number of drinks at the bar and…

Read More

Ontario Court of Appeal awards $266,000 to a deaf worker who suffered a “campaign of abuse” from her employer

By Uncategorized

In a recent striking case, the Ontario Court of Appeal more than doubled the award granted to a deaf worker who was forced to resign from her job due to her employer’s “campaign of abuse”. In this shocking case Vicky Strudwick worked for a polling firm for a salary close to the federal minimum wage for over a decade. The Court found that, shortly after becoming deaf due to a viral infection, the plaintiff’s supervisors decided to make her quit by making her job environment intolerable and started a campaign designed to make her feel humiliated and unwanted due to…

Read More

Court reaffirms a historic order to reinstate an employee with full back pay after an 11-year absence

By Uncategorized

Recently the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the employer in Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v. Fair therefore reaffirming the significant 2013 decision to reinstate an employee after an 11-year absence with full back pay and damages. The case should serve as a warning to employers regarding the scope of accommodation required from them in cases of employee disability. Employers have a duty to accommodate sick or injured workers to the point of undue hardship. In this case, an employee of the School Board took time off work and was subsequently diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder and depression, which resulted…

Read More

Reasonable notice required of both employers and employees – Superior Court of Ontario

By Uncategorized

In the recent decision of Gagnon & Associates Inc. the Court reminds us that both employers and employees have the obligation to provide reasonable notice of intention to terminate the employment relationship. In this case, two long-term, key, but unhappy, employees tendered their resignations to their employer with immediate effect after being offered a job at a competing company. The employees together were responsible for over 60% of the employer’s sales and so their immediate departure had a greatly negative impact on the performance of the company, which was not able to find replacements for some time. The employer filed suit…

Read More

Are You Being Harassed at Work and Not Sure What to Do?

By Uncategorized

Harassment in the workplace can take on various characteristics. It could in the form of a derogatory comment made in your presence, but not directly to you. It might be an off-colour joke, or a change in workplace policies, you feel are directed specifically towards you and violates one or more of your legally protected characteristics, including, but not limited to race, disability, sexual orientation, age, or sex. The first thing you need to remember is you have rights and freedoms, whether you are a Canadian citizen or are employed through a work-visa programme. Unfortunately, the balance of power between…

Read More

Court rules on Performance Improvement Plans

By Uncategorized

Employers use performance improvement plans in order to help improve the work of underperforming or struggling employees. Generally, they are intended to allow the employer to determine the reason for the employee’s underperformance, address failures, and make sure that the employee has been provided with the proper tools, training and resources necessary to succeed in his or her position. Poor performance during the plan period may, moreover, constitute cause for termination. However, in order to do so, the plan must be fair, and managed and implemented carefully, the Ontario Superior Court ruled in the recent case of Brake v. PJ-M2R Restaurant…

Read More
Scroll To Top